<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article>
  <abstract>Photographer Mary Mhoon speaks with Allen Frame about how she found photography through the lens of the vintage Diana camera.</abstract>
  <approved type="boolean">true</approved>
  <approved-at type="datetime" nil="true"></approved-at>
  <author>Allen Frame</author>
  <body>p(q). %Allen Frame% In the early to mid '70s when I met you and before you started photography, you had close contact with quite a few photographers.

p(a). %Mary Mhoon% I did.

p(q). %AF% Perry Walker, of course, Lyn Gardiner, Bill Eggleston. Stephen Shore, Murray Riss, Lee Friedlander, and some of them stayed at your house in Memphis...

p(a). %MM% William Christenberry, John Gossage, Richard Pare.

p(q). %AF% I find it interesting that after that kind of exposure you chose a format that was so seemingly naive&#8212;the Diana Camera. How did you decide to do that?

p(a). %MM% Well, I liked the camera because it was easy to operate, and I don't like machines because I'm easily intimidated by them. I think of myself that way anyway, the camera was given to me by an irritated photographer who was tired of my making suggestions to him. So I picked it up and started to understand it. I had enjoyed being around those photographers. It must have affected me in some way, but I'm not aware of influences.

p(q). %AF% When did you know you were going to do photography? When the camera was presented to you? Or before?

p(a). %MM% When the camera was presented to me, I began, very slowly, to take photographs. And I mean, maybe 10 rolls in 1979, my first year. I treated it seriously. I think it is a serious camera so my shots were not grabbed.

p(q). %AF% I can see that from the first photographs you did with it.

p(a). %MM% Also, the simplicity of the camera, the child-like quality of it, appealed to me because I think of my work as being very simple. It's two-fold&#8212;I mean it can be spare as a whippet or lush to the point of squalor, but I think that what I feel most comfortable with is the leanest image because it's more related to primal images&#8212;the kind of thing one thinks of being known before it's seen and being retained after one is blind. When I was entertaining all those photographers they were usually staying at my house, or I was having dinner parties for them, I had no interest in taking photographs

p(q). %AF% Do you think that other than the camera's being easy to operate, and given its simplicity, there is also a moving away from the pompous hardware of 4 x 5 cameras, tripods, etc. that were big in the '70s?

p(a). %MM% Maybe, but of course I didn't originate the concept of elevating this toy to an instrument for eternal art or anything like that. But certainly the dream quality of its _benign distortion_ someone called it, the fuzziness at the edges appealed to me. The camera's not made anymore.

p(q). %AF% What is the main stylistic issue in your work?

p(a). %MM% The nature of my business is tombstone...which is a line I cribbed off a Reverand Milam in Byhalia, Mississippi, who makes tombstones. But themes of fear and loss emerge. There's something bony about them which I like. When it shows up I like it.

p(q). %AF% Of any of the photographers working in the last 15 years, is there one who's most important to your work? Not to your life, but to your work?

p(a). %MM% No,I don't I think of "bodies of work" of other photographers, except Paul Strand. Bill Brandt definitely. But I think more of individual images. I may even forget what photographer did them.

p(q). %AF% That's interesting because I think you rarely see a discussion of the history of photography in terms of specific photographs. Well that's not true. There's Roland Barthes' ??Camera Lucida??, John Szarkowski's ??Looking at Photographs??...

p(a). %MM% Collectors are advised to buy the weakest work of a well-known artist always instead of a very strong anonymous work, which is interesting. I guess collectors are in the business of having appreciating collections. But that wouldn't interest me at all.

p(q). %AF% Do you think it is easier for a photographer to exist outside of N.Y. than a painter or sculptor maybe?

p(a). %MM% I don't know, Allen, about that. I know in Memphis, the hottest shots around are hardly those heard "'round the world" and vice versa. Memphis and the great outside seem to be mutually exclusive. There's a voodoo spirit in Memphis that swallows people. It's as if Memphis was built over a swamp. Every now and then, talented people seem to be sucked under, and they're never heard from again.

p(q). %AF% Is it difficult to have a long term relationship with another photographer?

p(a). %MM% No. I find it...the photographer that I live with, am in love with, was the irritated professional that slammed the camera down in my hand.

p(q). %AF% The Diana camera? 

p(a). %MM% Yes and he has taught me how to print and I might never have been a photographer...*probably under other circumstances...I hope I would have. 

&amp;nbsp;</body>
  <category-id type="integer">10</category-id>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-07-07T21:37:15-04:00</created-at>
  <created-by>Admin</created-by>
  <editors-suggestion type="integer" nil="true"></editors-suggestion>
  <homepage-category-id type="integer">0</homepage-category-id>
  <homepage-position type="integer">0</homepage-position>
  <id type="integer">220</id>
  <image-id type="integer">41017</image-id>
  <in-feed type="boolean">false</in-feed>
  <indexed-author>Frame, Allen</indexed-author>
  <indexed-title>Mhoon, Mary</indexed-title>
  <intro>&amp;nbsp;
!!41011!!

This interview took place over telephone between N.Y. and Memphis, January 1983.

&amp;nbsp;



</intro>
  <issue-id type="integer">5</issue-id>
  <no-banner type="boolean" nil="true"></no-banner>
  <status type="integer">0</status>
  <teaser></teaser>
  <title>Mary Mhoon</title>
  <update-reason></update-reason>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-10-30T15:43:56-04:00</updated-at>
  <updated-by>Editor</updated-by>
</article>
